The UI looks OK to me. It's self descriptive and pretty easy to follow. The only thing which can confuse is "Tags" - it's pretty hard to understand that Tags is actually a set of tracks...RadioDave said:lol - I used to write old DOS programs! Primarily for online (think, "dialup") systems. I really wish I had a good UI designer...
Thank you for the good words!indieradionetwork said:I needed something that was easier for playlists and such. I did buy a copy of RadioBOSS yesterday, so I have my own copy and I love it! I will use it for the first time on Sunday under the paid version of it.
Thanks David! Can we use this on the Testimonials (http://www.djsoft.net/enu/testimonials.htm) page?David said:Let me Welcome You to RadioBOSS. I think you will find it is a wonderful piece of software. It is easier to use than most and I find the support is the absolute best...
Thanks David! Can we use this on the Testimonials (http://www.djsoft.net/enu/testimonials.htm) page?
What project?I find this project very interesting. Are there plans to continue and improve it?
Hi Dimitry, I wish you a wonderful 2026.What project?
Playlist Generator does create .m3u files, as its purpose is to create the playlists. Why create a different tool that does the same?I think it would be interesting to create an external plugin to create m3u lists for RB.
I have found it difficult to work with PGP.
I think it would be useful to create a simpler plugin.
Its use is complex due to its analytical nature. We need to simplify it by avoiding so many configurations.Playlist Generator does create .m3u files, as its purpose is to create the playlists. Why create a different tool that does the same?
It's not really complex, in its easiest configuration you can simply add categories that you need, select folders where categories load the music from, and then create a rotation, the whole process takes less than 30 seconds. For advanced use, you can start configuring priorities and constraints and other things. But this is not necessary if you don't need or want that.Its use is complex due to its analytical nature. We need to simplify it by avoiding so many configurations.
Perhaps one option could be for PGP to have two windows, one for quick configuration and another for advanced users, but both generating the same end result.