Different time duration track

pety

Active member
Dmitriy

Please, solve this in the next update.
I asked for that long time ago.
Now I have problems with it in the last verion of RB.

In Search Panel the duration is different than in Main Playlist for the same track.

That takes me a lot of time, becouse Radio BOSS is not accurate.

Please, again, if there are tracks wich were scanned and silence removed, let Search to read duration between START and END as Main Playlist does.

It is very annoying to select some tracks with specific duration and to realise that in playlist it is not what I want. I cannot guess what duration have tracks in Search. It doesn't work like that.

Thanks for your help !
 

Attachments

  • different_duration.jpg
    different_duration.jpg
    278.7 KB · Views: 329
Do you have the "Read additional info" check box checked under the search results? This is required for RB to calculate duration considering the start/end markers.
 
djsoft said:
Do you have the "Read additional info" check box checked under the search results? This is required for RB to calculate duration considering the start/end markers.
Understand!
There is a problem if i check duration in a library with 2000 tracks.
I'll wait until the start moment for that specific track goes away...
 
pety said:
djsoft said:
Do you have the "Read additional info" check box checked under the search results? This is required for RB to calculate duration considering the start/end markers.
Understand!
There is a problem if i check duration in a library with 2000 tracks.
I'll wait until the start moment for that specific track goes away...
Do you mean it becomes slow with this option checked?
 
djsoft said:
pety said:
djsoft said:
Do you have the "Read additional info" check box checked under the search results? This is required for RB to calculate duration considering the start/end markers.
Understand!
There is a problem if i check duration in a library with 2000 tracks.
I'll wait until the start moment for that specific track goes away...
Do you mean it becomes slow with this option checked?
Yes!
Maybe an xml file as memory buffer will help.
For libraries. From time to time that xml will be updated.

Jus a suggestion...
 
pety said:
Yes!
Maybe an xml file as memory buffer will help.
For libraries. From time to time that xml will be updated.

Jus a suggestion...
OK, noted. One of the next updates will include such an optimization.
 
Back
Top