Thank you, will be fixed in the next update.
Not necessarily it will appear in the end of the list - if the events list is sorted, it will be positioned based on sorting. If the list is not sorted, the position of the newly added event is undefined.
RadioBOSS 6.1 [beta]
- Thread starter djsoft
- Start date
I guess you should remove all drivers and software related to the audio interface. And then reinstall it. It appears there's some sort of a conflict.
They just don't like to pay for the software. They only love free software - not because it's good, but because it's free.
Chathizpano Radio
Member
Hi Dmitri,
I have already solved the issue of drivers, musictribe (for Behringer) has created a beta version of the drivers for Windows 11 and it works without errors or problems of any kind.
Screenshots of how RadioBoss should be configured to work with ASIO have been shared with me.
Everything works special and at 48000 Hz.
The only small drawback that I notice is that now in the "volume mixer" of Windows, RadioBoss does not appear, so I cannot mute RB to monitor myself through the web of my radio.
Is there any possibility through configuration or code for RadioBoss to reappear in the volume mixer?
Chathizpano Radio
Member
P.S.
If instead of ASIO I choose WASAPI in Playback settings RadioBoss appears again in the volume mixer.
If instead of ASIO I choose WASAPI in Playback settings RadioBoss appears again in the volume mixer.
When you use ASIO, sound does not go through Windows Mixer therefore it can't display its level or control it. It's how the system works.
Chathizpano Radio
Member
From what I have read, both ASIO and WASAPI are protocols and as such do nothing more than faithfully transport the audio from the source (media player) to the audio endpoint (the audio device's buffer).
They do not alter a single bit or alter the sample rate.
In fact I do not notice differences in the quality of the audio when switching between these protocols.
Therefore, to continue keeping RadioBoss on the mixer I will use WASAPI.
Is my conclusion correct?
They don't, but Windows Mixer does not support ASIO and will not let you see playback levels or control anything.
ASIO provides much lower latency, and it's also useful for multi-channel sound cards, when there are lots of channels.
Chathizpano Radio
Member
I have already opened a ticket with Microsoft to see if I can find a solution with a patch or they plan to update and add it in the future.
We are in the 21st century with the new Windows 11 and Microsoft still does not solve the compatibility with all the protocols....
As always Dmitri, thank you for sharing your wise knowledge with this beautiful community.
gustavo-rene.franco
Member
Hi Dimitry!
Radioboss is one of the best radio automators I have ever used and I congratulate it on that, because it is also the only one that is updated with many improvements.
Now, with all due respect to you, and I know you are a great capable man, I would like to have a stable Radioboss without so many outgoing versions. Why ? because you do not get to know all the operation and the added functions that we already have another.
I'm not saying this because it seems bad to me, but rather, it would be nice to have a STABLE version, without ERRORS or FAILURES for some time. If there are new functions, it would only be good to be able to add them from a link and be able to decide if each user wants to do it or not. Because I have seen that functions that worked very well are removed and others are added that in some cases present failures. I REPEAT, it is not to offend or anything like that, you study and are a trained engineer and I am not the one to tell you what is right or wrong. It is just an opinion of a simple user. Thank you very much and I hope I have not offended. Hug.
Radioboss is one of the best radio automators I have ever used and I congratulate it on that, because it is also the only one that is updated with many improvements.
Now, with all due respect to you, and I know you are a great capable man, I would like to have a stable Radioboss without so many outgoing versions. Why ? because you do not get to know all the operation and the added functions that we already have another.
I'm not saying this because it seems bad to me, but rather, it would be nice to have a STABLE version, without ERRORS or FAILURES for some time. If there are new functions, it would only be good to be able to add them from a link and be able to decide if each user wants to do it or not. Because I have seen that functions that worked very well are removed and others are added that in some cases present failures. I REPEAT, it is not to offend or anything like that, you study and are a trained engineer and I am not the one to tell you what is right or wrong. It is just an opinion of a simple user. Thank you very much and I hope I have not offended. Hug.
Chathizpano Radio
Member
I know you expect Dimitry's comments, and in fact he will give them to you.
But what you say can cause more problems than solutions.
Incorporating functions from a link, having others that may be incompatible or do not adapt well to the model, I think it would not work in my humble point of view.
One thing is a complete, stable, tested app and another thing is an app that you are patching and then errors will come and you will not know what they are due to, with the consequent personal inconvenience and RB technical support.
I repeat, it is the humble point of view of a user, I am not an engineer.
hug
This is how the software industry works. Even largest corporations like Microsoft can't get rid of the bugs completely, with all their money and army of employees etc.
Adding new features always means adding new bugs and issues, this is how it is. We have to add new features in order to compete on the market. Also, people suggest new features and they'd like to see them added sooner rather than later.
You ask us to stop adding any new features and just fix the bugs. If I were a potential customer, I wouldn't like that, because products in such state this seem to be dead (and in a sense, they actually are).
This is an extremely rare case in RadioBOSS, we almost never remove anything. Can you please tell me what useful feature was removed?
Adding functions as plugins will produce many more new bugs, and I guess very few users will like to do additional work - find, download, install plugin.
gustavo-rene.franco
Member
whether it can be or not .... but it was just a suggestion.
Just to name one and the best known, to play videos before you just clicked and the video was played and so was the one that followed. Now with the new ones many times they don't play, only the 1st one but the one that follows it in the list doesn't .... the URLs only some take it when before you put any URLs and they played ... and things like that ... but maybe is wrong.
Just to name one and the best known, to play videos before you just clicked and the video was played and so was the one that followed. Now with the new ones many times they don't play, only the 1st one but the one that follows it in the list doesn't .... the URLs only some take it when before you put any URLs and they played ... and things like that ... but maybe is wrong.
Do you mean videos are not played in RadioBOSS? If so, please provide more details on what actually happens.
Is there a problem with playing the URLs?
